Hugging the business too closely can squeeze the lifeblood
out of IT
by Peter High
Much has been written about the need for information technology
departments to align with the business units within their companies.
IT should understand the company's strategic direction, so the
thinking goes, and develop solutions to meet those needs. This
trend led many IT departments to develop a return on investment
(ROI) analysis for each project.
Although the advantages of IT's intimacy with the business abound,
the concept raises the question: Is it possible for IT to focus
on the business at its own expense?
As IT achieves more value on behalf of the business, it tends
to focus less on IT, reminding us that IT's alignment with business
must be balanced with an alignment of business to IT. The former
has been sacrosanct, whereas the latter is rarely considered.
For a true partnership between business and IT, IT must manage
its infrastructure and educate the business about technology.
If IT ignores its own needs, the business suffers from increased
downtime and IT's inability to scale appropriately.
In the late 1990s, the IT department at Hilton Hotels performed
well, but was viewed as supportive to the business. Underscoring
that role, the then-CIO reported into hotel operations.
After acquiring Promus Hotel in 1999, the organization began viewing
IT differently.
Promus had developed a property management technology called System21.
Under the stewardship of Tim Harvey, Hilton's executive vice president
and chief information officer, the company leveraged System21,
now called OnQ, into a tool that integrates reservation management,
property management, CRM, revenue management, forecast and content
management, Balanced Scorecard activities, and a host of other
services for all the Hilton brands. Unlike competitors who have
different solutions for these functions, now, as Hilton adds about
300 hotels annually, each one need only invest in OnQ, and a holistic
technology solution is in place. Although Hilton remains a hospitality
company, technology is one of the main sources of its competitive
advantage.
As Hilton IT delivered increased value, Harvey realized the business
needed to be educated about IT to ensure enough attention was
spent managing systems infrastructure. He ensured IT staff spent
time with business colleagues to understand their needs and to
learn business language. This enabled Hilton IT to better communicate
its plans, including metrics related to on-time, on-scope, and
on-budget.
For many companies, infrastructure remains the domain of techies.
At Hilton, IT communicates its plans to improve the infrastructure
across the business.
Dean Permenter, vice president, shared infra-structure services,
explains, "We are constantly improving infrastructure efficiency
through virtualization, where several applications share the server,
storage, or backup capacity. The result: A true enterprise solution
instead of individual systems requiring additional management
and resources such as power and cooling."
Hilton IT decreased baseline costs (those costs required to "keep
the lights on") even as the hotel grew. By providing the
business with value metrics to represent such infrastructure successes,
the inner workings of IT become tangible.
Too often, business-IT alignment is taken in that order. To be
truly consultative to the business, IT must educate the business
on its own needs and constraints and how its capabilities can
serve the business.
Aligning IT to the business is just the first step toward opening
the lines of communication, which should flow in both directions
if companies wish to fully leverage IT.
Peter High is president of Metis Strategy, a Washington, D.C.-based
consulting firm specializing in the intersection of business strategy
and IT.
Originally published in CIO
Digest,
January/February 2007, Copyright © 2007 Symantec
Corporation, republished with permission.